III) Within the Variation in the father of deceased namely Muhammad Iqbal (complainant of second Model) fatal injury was attributed to Allah Ditta son of Haqnawaz and role attributed to the petitioner and others was simple existence with aerial firing without any injury to deceased or PWs.
The focus is around the intention to cause injury. This can be a major trouble: a very small threshold for an offence carrying the death penalty.
V) During investigation, the Investigating Officer concluded that fireplace-arm injury which was fatal for the deceased was caused because of the petitioner but in support of opinion in the Investigating Officer no iota of evidence is out there around the file and mere ipsi dixit of police just isn't binding to the Court.
کیا ایف آئی آر درخواست گزار کی رپورٹ پر درج کی گئی تھی اور اگر ہاں تو کیا اسے اس کے خلاف ثبوت کے طور پر استعمال کیا جا سکتا ہے؟
94 . Const. P. 256/2025 (D.B.) Hafeezullah V/S Govt of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi It really is well-settled that the civil servants must first go after internal appeals within ninety days. Should the appeal is just not decided within that timeframe, he/she can then solution the service tribunal to challenge the initial order. Once they do so, the Tribunal must decide the appeal on merits and cannot merely direct the department to decide it, as the ninety days to the department to act has already expired. Over the aforesaid proposition, we've been guided from the decision on the Supreme Court within the case of Dr.
Reasonable grounds are offered within the record to connect the petitioner with the commission with the alleged offence. Although punishment of the alleged offence does not fall inside the prohibitory clause of Section 497, Cr.P.C. yet acquired Deputy Prosecutor General apprises that another case of similar nature arising outside of FIR No. 1250/2024 dated 10.05.2024 registered under Section 489-F, PPC at Police Station Haji Pura, District Sialkot get more info is from the credit of the petitioner as accused, therefore, case on the petitioner falls in the exception where bail cannot be granted even while in the cases not falling within the ambit of prohibition contained in Section 497, Cr.P.C. In this regard, guidance is sought from the case of “Muhammad Imran versus The State and others” (PLD 2021 Supreme Court 903); relevant portion with the same is hereby reproduced:
seventy three . Const. P. 288/2024 (D.B.) Engro Fertilizers Limited through Asad Shakil Khan V/S Full Bench of NIRC & others Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur Pertaining to the second issue of non-service of grievance notice. Under Section 33 of the Industrial Relations Ac1,2012 (lRA 2012), ifa grievance notice isn't served, the grievance petition is often dismissed. This is because service of your grievance notice is usually a mandatory need and a precondition for filing a grievance petition. The law requires that a grievance notice be served within the employer before filing a grievance petition. This allows the employer to reply to the grievance and attempt to resolve it amicably. Should the employer fails to reply or resolve the grievance, the employee can then file a grievance petition with the National Industrial Relations Commission CNIRC) In case the organization is transprovincial.
The issue here is that an accused may say that they meant to injure the target, but they didn't intend to destroy them. In other words, they might claim that thedeath that resulted mainly because of the accused’s attack was neither foreseeable nor meant.
Section 302 from the PPC outlines the punishment for “Qatl-i-Amd” (intentional murder) in Pakistan. According to this provision, if a person intentionally causes the death of another individual, they shall be issue to the most severe form of punishment permissible under Pakistani law.
acquitted the appellants from the many charges therefore the same is dismissed being infructuous. (Criminal Revision )
Case regulation, also known as precedent, forms the foundation of your Pakistani legal system. Understanding relevant judgments and rulings is essential for interpreting statutes and predicting legal outcomes. Free access to these resources democratizes legal knowledge, empowering citizens and promoting transparency.
PACER allows any individual with an account to search and Track down appellate, district, and bankruptcy court case and docket information. Register for just a PACER account.
Section 489-F in the Pakistan Penal Code pertains to offenses involving copyright currency notes and cash. Its primary objective is always to curb counterfeiting activities and maintain the sanctity of your national currency.
Finding reliable free case regulation sites can be challenging. Lots of websites involve subscriptions or offer limited information. This article helps you navigate the landscape of free case regulation resources in Pakistan, delivering you with a curated list of reliable and accessible platforms.